Worker Dignity, Workplace Relations and Employee Development
Business Case
Brand reputation
Innovation and adaptability
Operational continuity
Productivity and quality
Stable sourcing communities and sustainable livelihoods
Strategy & Planning
Assessment
Identify procurement categories and sourcing regions with risk of abusive management practices and poor employment relations, based on:
- sectors with high power imbalances between management and workers
- regions with weak labour inspection or limited legal recourse for workers
Conduct an annual risk review with risk segmentation of suppliers based on the following criteria, updating category and supplier risk ratings and reflecting changes in data, industry trends and regulatory expectations:
- sector or region history of workplace harassment, abuse or misconduct findings
- management structures with limited oversight of supervisory conduct or absence of HR function
Identify gaps in employment relations monitoring across high-risk supplier portfolio and develop action plans to address unmonitored categories, regions or supplier groups, with multi‑year forecasting to anticipate emerging risks.
Policy
Establish commitment to respectful and dignified employment relations in supply chains, requiring suppliers to comply with applicable labour laws and maintain workplaces free from abuse, covering:
- zero tolerance for physical violence, sexual harassment and sexual coercion in the workplace
- prohibition of verbal abuse, threats, intimidation and humiliation by management or supervisors
- fair and documented disciplinary procedures that respect worker dignity
- protection from retaliation for workers who report misconduct or raise concerns about management behaviour
- safe and confidential channels for workers to report abusive treatment
- commitment to providing workers with access to training and development opportunities
Integrate employment relations risk criteria into sourcing decisions for high-risk categories, requiring enhanced due diligence on management conduct and workplace culture as a condition of supplier approval or contract renewal.
While focusing on remediation before termination decisions are made, establish a workplace relations escalation protocol with:
- trigger criteria (repeated verified misconduct, failure to investigate complaints, retaliation against complaints)
- defined consequences for escalated cases
Require strategic suppliers to implement their own employment relations due diligence processes based on required due diligence quality controls and to cascade respectful workplace requirements to their suppliers.
Targets
Set targets for percentage of suppliers with stated policies on respectful treatment and anti-harassment.
Set targets for percentage of high-risk suppliers assessed on employment relations practices.
Set targets for percentage of high-risk suppliers with verified anti-harassment and respectful workplace procedures in place, including topics such as misconduct‑complaint resolution rates, supervisor‑training coverage and worker trust in reporting mechanisms.
Supplier Selection
Screening
Add employment relations questions to pre-qualification and RFP processes:
- policy on anti-harassment, anti-violence and respectful workplace conduct
- disciplinary procedures and documentation practices
- mechanism for workers to report management misconduct confidentially and policy on non-retaliation for raising complaints
- training and development opportunities available to workers
- history of workplace misconduct findings or related legal actions
To apply for RFP, request evidence such as documentation on:
- records of supervisory training on respectful management and anti-harassment
- complaint and investigation procedures, including confidentiality and non-retaliation protections
- participation rates for training and development programs available to workers
- grievance data related to management conduct
Require suppliers to submit:
- employment relations due diligence policy covering own supply chain
- evidence of respectful workplace monitoring at sub-tier level
- documented track record of investigating and acting on complaints of abusive management
- independent verification of harassment‑prevention systems, including third‑party assessments, worker interviews and grievance‑validation checks
- submission of multi‑year misconduct‑trend data
Selection
Select only suppliers confirming policies on respectful treatment, anti-harassment and fair disciplinary procedures.
Allocate points in selection criteria for suppliers demonstrating:
- documented and implemented anti-harassment policies with clear complaint procedures
- investment in supervisory training on respectful management
- worker access to training and development opportunities
Select suppliers demonstrating:
- independently assessed employment relations practices
- functioning accountability mechanisms for management misconduct
- cascaded respectful workplace standards to sub-suppliers
Contracts
Include clauses on:
- zero tolerance for physical violence, sexual harassment and verbal abuse
- confidential reporting channels for workplace misconduct
- non-retaliation protections
- right to audit
Include enforceable corrective action requirements for misconduct findings and requirement for notification in case of any serious incidents of harassment, violence or abusive management.
Require cascading of employment relations clauses to their own suppliers.
Supplier Engagement
Goal Setting
Work with suppliers to understand their current employment relations practices and, where issues are identified, determine appropriate goals for improvement.
Set goals with suppliers on specific strategies to address identified employment relations issues, such as implementing supervisory training programs, strengthening complaint investigation procedures, establishing accountability mechanisms for management misconduct or developing worker training and skills development programs.
Set goals with Tier 1 suppliers on cascading respectful workplace and anti-harassment programs to their own suppliers (Tier 2+) and establish multi-year targets for verified compliance across the extended supply chain.
Capacity Building
Provide guidance and basic training to suppliers on anti-harassment requirements, fair disciplinary procedures, abusive management, confidential complaint mechanisms and employee development programs.
Train suppliers on analyzing complaint and misconduct data to identify patterns and root causes and developing employment relations improvement roadmaps with measurable milestones.
Provide detailed training on conducting employment relations due diligence within their own supply chains and identifying abusive management risks at sub-supplier level.
Data
Support suppliers with obtaining baseline data on topics such as: existence of anti-harassment policies, complaint mechanism functionality, disciplinary procedures, supervisory training and any history of serious workplace misconduct incidents.
Support suppliers in developing structured systems to track workplace misconduct complaints, investigation outcomes and disciplinary action, as well as a tracking of root‑cause analysis for each misconduct type.
Work with suppliers to develop integrated reporting systems that capture employment relations data across their own supply chains, including audit findings, misconduct incident data, remediation outcomes and supervisory training coverage.
Advisory
Provide guidance to suppliers on recognizing abusive supervisory behaviour and establishing accountability for management conduct.
Consult and work with suppliers on how to assess employment relations risks in their own supply chains, including screening their own suppliers.
Consult and work with suppliers in embedding employment relations due diligence and supplier engagement into their own procurement practices, including developing their own supplier codes, screening processes and engagement programs.
Financial Support
Fund supplier access to anti-harassment training resources, complaint mechanism design tools and supervisory development programs.
Provide commercial incentives to suppliers for improvements in employment relations performance, such as price, volume, duration and preferred supplier status.
Link commercial incentives (contract extensions, volume increases, pricing adjustments) to verified progress on eliminating abusive management practices across the supplier's own supply chain.
Audits
Require suppliers to complete self-assessment questionnaires on employment relations practices, covering anti-harassment policies, disciplinary procedures, complaint mechanisms, supervisory training and worker development opportunities.
Include employment relations checks in supplier audit programs as part of human rights due diligence with worker‑voice validation (confidential interviews, surveys), including verification on topics such as:
- verbal abuse, threats, intimidation or humiliation by supervisors or managers
- physical violence or assault in the workplace
- sexual harassment or sexual coercion
- punitive or degrading disciplinary practices
- arbitrary or retaliatory dismissal of workers who raise complaints
- using disciplinary measures as a tool of intimidation rather than fair correction
- withholding benefits, promotions or assignments as punishment for raising concerns
- creating a climate of fear where workers do not feel safe reporting abusive behaviour
- absence of safe or confidential mechanisms for reporting management misconduct
- absence of training, mentorship or development opportunities for workers
- grievance systems and procedures related to management conduct
Work with strategic suppliers to conduct their own supplier audits on employment relations and share audit findings.
Project Partnerships & Innovation
Host supplier events or conferences in partnership with labor rights organizations or worker development NGOs, bringing suppliers together to learn from established programs on respectful management practices, grievance mechanisms and worker development.
Collaborate with international organizations, training institutions and industry peers to develop joint supplier programs on employment relations, such as shared training curricula or standards on addressing complaints.
Lead cross-sector coalitions with suppliers, labor rights organizations, training institutions and industry peers to drive systemic improvement in employment relations, such as establishing cross-company mentoring initiatives for worker career development or co-funding research on effective approaches to worker development in specific sectors or regions.
Continuous Improvement
Metrics
Track percentage of suppliers assessed and/or trained on employment relations practices, as well as percentage of suppliers with anti-harassment policies and complaint mechanisms.
Track supplier progress indicators across the supplier base engaged in the programs, such as:
- percentage of suppliers engaged in employment relations supplier engagement programs
- complaint volumes and recurrence rates of misconduct or supervisory issues to identify systemic patterns
- investigation completion rates
- corrective action plan resolution outcomes, including timeliness and completeness, ensuring meaningful rather than superficial remediation
Track percentage of suppliers cascading employment relations policies and due diligence to their own supply chains.
Scorecards
Introduce basic employment relations criteria into yearly supplier evaluation forms, starting from onboarding:
- self-assessment on anti-harassment and respectful workplace practices
- checklist for existence of basic policies and systems (complaint mechanism, disciplinary procedures, supervisory conduct expectations, worker development opportunities)
Include employment relations metrics in category business reviews and track progress on improvement plans, with differentiated consequences for repeatedly low‑performing suppliers.
Weigh employment relations performance in supplier scorecards, with top performers receiving preferential weighting in tenders and bottom performers required to submit improvement plans.
Impact Verification
Gather feedback from suppliers on effectiveness of engagement programs.
Assess whether supplier engagement initiatives are improving employment relations outcomes, including verification through worker-voice mechanisms.
Measure improvement in employment relations outcomes attributable to engagement programs. For example, consider:
- misconduct complaint rates and resolution quality before and after interventions
- tracking of whether supervisory training leads to measurable changes in worker-reported management conduct
- monitoring retaliation incidents and remediation over time
Sources consulted
- https://www.ilo.org/media/406901/download
- https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/02/oecd-due-…
- https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprincip…
- https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@asia/@ro-bangkok/…
- https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_COD…
- https://sustainableprocurement.unglobalcompact.org/