Living Wage
Business Case
Brand reputation
Financial resilience
Investor confidence
Market access
Operational continuity
Productivity and quality
Resilient supplier relationships
Stable sourcing communities and sustainable livelihoods
Strategy & Planning
Assessment
Identify procurement categories and sourcing regions with elevated risk of wage violations (low-wage sectors, regions with weak enforcement, high use of migrant or informal labour), such as:
- paying below minimum wage
- failing to pay overtime
- requiring off-the-clock work
- making illegal deductions (for uniforms, walkouts, etc.)
- misclassifying employees as independent contractors
- misclassifying employees as overtime-exempt
- stealing or misappropriating tips
- not paying for all hours worked (including preparation/cleanup)
- delaying final paychecks
- not paying for required travel time or training
- wage gaps for work of equal value
Conduct an annual living wage risk review, using recognised living wage benchmark for each sourcing region (Anker Methodology - Global Living Wage Coalition, Wage Indicator Foundation data or Fair Wage Network benchmarks), documenting the methodology used to ensure comparability across sourcing regions over time and complete risk segmentation based on the following:
- wage‑gap severity
- overtime dependency
- emerging trends
Identify living wage gaps across high-risk supplier portfolio by comparing current supplier worker remuneration (including base pay, bonuses and in-kind benefits) against living wage benchmarks across high-risk supplier portfolio and develop action plans to address unmonitored categories, regions or supplier groups.
Policy
Establish commitment to fair wages and incomes in supply chains, requiring suppliers to comply with applicable wage and hour laws.
Integrate living wage risk criteria into sourcing decisions for high-risk categories, requiring suppliers to work toward paying living wage and enhanced due diligence on living wage as a condition of supplier approval or contract renewal.
For existing suppliers, while focusing on remediation before termination decisions are made, establish a living wage escalation protocol with:
- trigger criteria (serious incidents, repeated findings, falsified records)
- mandatory intensified monitoring
- defined consequences
Integrate living wage considerations and wage forecasting into procurement decisions and total cost of ownership calculation and require strategic suppliers to conduct their own living wage due diligence and share results.
Targets
Set targets for percentage of suppliers assessed on living wage practices.
Set targets for percentage of high-risk suppliers with verified wage compliance.
Set targets for percentage of supply chain workers earning a living wage.
Supplier Selection
Screening
Add wage-related questions to supplier pre-qualification and RFPs:
- confirmation of compliance with legal minimum wage requirements
- payment frequency and method
- provision of pay documentation to workers
- policy on wage deductions
- policy on equal pay for work of equal value
Request evidence of wage practices from suppliers:
- wage levels, sample pay records or payroll summaries (anonymized)
- overtime payment policies and records
- benefits documentation
- grievance records related to wage issues
To respond to RFPs, request documentation on:
- commitments to living wage progress
- multi‑year wage trends, including wage‑gap analyses vs. living‑wage benchmarks
- independent wage‑audit reports
Selection
Prioritize suppliers with living wage policies.
Allocate points in selection criteria for suppliers demonstrating:
- fair wage practices beyond legal minimums
- awareness of and progress toward living wage benchmarks
Prioritize suppliers with verified living wage certification or demonstrated progress toward closing living wage gaps, including:
- evidence of worker‑voice validation (surveys, interviews, grievance trends confirming timely and complete payments)
- sustainable wage‑improvement mechanisms (reducing overtime dependency, improving wage structures)
Contracts
Include contractual clauses requiring:
- compliance with applicable wage and hour laws
- prohibition of illegal deductions
- right to audit and review wage records.
Include contractual clauses requiring:
- accurate record‑keeping (time, pay, benefits)
- requirement to notify buyer of any wage-related violations or legal actions with an established red‑flag escalation protocol in case of wage theft, illegal deductions, falsification of wage records and retaliation against workers raising wage concerns
Include contractual commitments for suppliers to close living wage gaps within specified timeframes.
Supplier Engagement
Goal Setting
Work with suppliers to determine appropriate goals to close gap between living wage and wage currently paid, such as eliminating illegal deductions, ensuring correct overtime premiums and providing transparent pay documentation.
Set goals with suppliers on specific strategies and improvements to close living wage gaps, such as reducing overtime dependency, increasing base pay, formalizing benefits, etc.
Set multi-year goals with Tier 1 suppliers on working with their suppliers (Tier 2 and 3) to ensure living wage is paid.
Capacity Building
Provide guidance and basic training to suppliers on wage and hour compliance requirements and share resources on living wage benchmarks and methodologies, explaining the difference between legal wage and living wage.
Provide training to suppliers on:
- conducting wage gap analyses
- understanding wage components (base pay, benefits, in‑kind, allowances)
- reducing overtime dependency
- improving payroll accuracy and documentation quality
- establishing transparent wage policies and grievance procedures
- developing wage improvement roadmaps
Provide detailed training on strategies to most effectively close the living wage gap.
Data
Request baseline wage data from suppliers in priority categories:
- wage levels by worker type
- overtime payments
- deductions and allowances
- payment method and frequency
Support suppliers in developing structured wage management systems to enable systematic tracking and sustainable wage improvements.
Require verified wage distribution data across the pay structure, including evidence of living wage gap trends over time.
Certifications
Provide guidance on existing fair labour certification programs.
Financially sponsor suppliers to participate in recognized wage benchmarking or fair labour certification programs.
Require certification for strategic suppliers in high-risk categories and support Tier 2 suppliers in achieving certification.
Advisory
Provide guidance to suppliers on how to identify living wage gaps.
Provide guidance to suppliers on establishing a fair compensation program, including key components (wage policy, pay documentation, grievance mechanisms, violations).
Support suppliers in embedding living wage into their own procurement practices and subcontractor management processes.
Financial Support
Identify funds to support supplier access to living wage benchmark data, wage analysis tools and wage gap assessment resources.
Offer preferential payment terms, early payment options or purchase-order financing for suppliers demonstrating progress on wage and income commitments or offer volume commitments and/or longer contract terms to suppliers that demonstrate wage improvements, giving them the revenue stability to sustain higher wages.
Link commercial incentives (contract extensions, volume increases, pricing adjustments) to verified progress on closing living wage gaps.
Audits
Include wage compliance checks as part of supplier audit programs and human rights due diligence, including verification that workers have access to grievance mechanisms to report wage violations without retaliation and verification of worker voice mechanisms such as wage surveys to confirm that recorded wages reflect wages were actually received by workers and that deductions and in-kind benefit valuations are understood and accepted by workers.
Commission independent wage audits in high-risk categories as part of human rights due diligence, including verification of payroll records, overtime payments and in-kind benefit valuations and assess whether grievance mechanisms are functioning and accessible to all workers.
Require strategic suppliers to conduct their own due diligence on wages and share findings.
Project Partnerships & Innovation
Join industry groups or topic-specific coalitions to share best practices and learn from successful implementation strategies.
Work with suppliers, partners, sector peers or international organizations to develop solutions for improving living wage across shared supply chains, such as open access to global benchmarking data.
Lead industry collaborations with suppliers, partners and sector peers to scale solutions for improving living wage across shared supply chains.
Continuous Improvement
Metrics
Track:
- percent of suppliers with sites in high risk regions / number of priority supplier sites in high risk regions
- percentage of suppliers assessed on wage practices
- percentage of suppliers that implemented required corrective actions
Track percentage of suppliers engaged in buyer living wage programs.
Track percentage of suppliers cascading living wage policies and due diligence to their own supply chains.
Scorecards
Introduce basic wage criteria into yearly supplier evaluation forms, starting from onboarding:
- self-assessment on living wage
- checklist for existence of basic policies (wage payment, documentation, deductions)
Include wage and income metrics in category business reviews and track progress on wage improvement plans, using results to influence sourcing decisions and renewal discussions.
Weigh living wage performance in supplier scorecards, with top performers receiving preferential weighting in tenders with commercial incentives and bottom performers required to submit improvement plans.
Impact Verification
Gather feedback from suppliers on effectiveness of engagement programs.
Assess whether supplier engagement initiatives are improving wage and income outcomes, cross-checking supplier-reported outcomes with additional independent data source such as worker surveys, grievance channel data or third-party assessment.
Measure improvement in supplier living wage outcomes attributable to engagement programs. For example, consider:
- percentage of supplier workers at or above living wage benchmark by sourcing region
- supplier worker-reported financial security and wage satisfaction (from surveys)
- reduction in supplier wage-related grievances over time
- comparing supplier audit findings before and after interventions
- tracking remediation outcomes and recurrence rates over time
- average living wage gap (in local currency) before vs. after program implementation
- commissioning independent evaluations of program effectiveness
Sources consulted
- https://sustainableprocurement.unglobalcompact.org/
- https://www.responsiblecontracting.org/toolkit
- https://idh.org/focus-areas/living-income
- https://www.idhsustainabletrade.com/roadmap-on-living-income/
- https://livingwageguide.idhtrade.org/interventions/improve-procurement-practices
- https://www.living-income.com/fileadmin/living_income/Events/Webinar/Responsibl…
- https://unglobalcompact.org/academy/course-library/livingwage-guidance-supply-c…