Disadvantaged community sourcing
Business Case
Brand reputation
Informed Decision Making
Investor confidence
Legal and regulatory compliance
Operational continuity
Stable sourcing communities and sustainable livelihoods
Strategy & Planning
Assessment
Define disadvantaged community groups based on the context and analyze the current supplier base to understand the current participation of businesses owned by disadvantaged community groups across key procurement categories, especially those that with multiple disadvantaged characteristics. Identify structural barriers (e.g., language, documentation expectations, cultural norms, digital‑access issues) that make it harder for disadvantaged‑community businesses to participate.
Conduct market analysis to understand the availability of disadvantaged community businesses in relevant procurement categories and regions and identify categories where they are underrepresented relative to community presence and market availability.
Conduct qualitative engagement with suppliers and relevant stakeholder organizations to understand.
- whether procurement processes are perceived as neutral, transparent and accessible
- procedural or informational barriers related to protected characteristics
- alignment between stated procurement policies and lived supplier experience
Policy
Include the following:
- definition of protected characteristics in your supply chain based on international standards, such as Indigenous groups, ethnic minorities, persons with disabilities or other underserved communities
- commitment to non-discrimination, equal access and fair competition in procurement processes so that supplier selection and engagement processes are fair regardless of ownership or community affiliation
- determination of which groups are covered under the policy based on the buyer's sourcing regions, community context and legal permissions within the buyer's jurisdiction and if certification would be required under the definition and by which entities.
- grievance policy and access to an effective non-judicial remedy for affected parties, so supplier have a formal, accessible and non-retaliatory channel to report barriers encountered in procurement processes.
- where procurement activities involve sourcing from or near indigenous territories, verify that Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) processes have been conducted with relevant communities prior to engaging those suppliers or supply chains.
In alignment with local laws on procurement or fair competition, require disadvantaged supplier inclusion into category strategies for relevant spend areas based on market underrepresentation.
In alignment with local laws on procurement or fair competition, require strategic suppliers to adopt their own disadvantaged community sourcing policies and apply them to their own sourcing decisions.
Targets
Set targets for the percentage of spend with disadvantaged community businesses across the procurement portfolio, with category-specific requirements reflecting their availability within key procurement categories.
Set targets for closing participation gaps between indigenous and disadvantaged suppliers and market availability, with category specific requirements for spend with disadvantaged groups reflecting the availability within key procurement categories.
Set targets for the percentage of strategic suppliers with their own active disadvantaged community business engagement programs or spend commitments within their supply chains.
Supplier Selection
Screening
In the screening process, consider whether disproportionate qualification requirements exist that are likely to disadvantage certain businesses. Add questions to RFPs to identify suppliers representing underrepresented or disadvantaged communities:
- business location and ownership
- company size and characteristics (revenue, employees)
- community affiliation
- relevant certification to verify community identity, such as national jurisdiction-specific verification, third-party certification, notarised declaration or recognition by a representative community organisation
Request information from suppliers on their own disadvantaged community sourcing practices.
In alignment with local laws on procurement or fair competition, require suppliers to provide verified evidence of existing spend with or active procurement programs for disadvantaged community businesses as a condition of eligibility to respond to RFPs in relevant categories.
Selection
Establish evaluation criteria to ensure fair evaluation which does not disadvantage indigenous, ethnic and underrepresented communities.
In alignment with local laws on procurement or fair competition, allocate points in selection criteria for suppliers that demonstrate active engagement with disadvantaged community businesses.
In alignment with local laws on procurement or fair competition, allocate points in selection criteria for the depth and maturity of suppliers' own disadvantaged community sourcing programs.
Contracts
Review contract terms with key disadvantaged community groups to ensure contract terms are supportive of business models and are reflective of cultural considerations.
Include contract clauses that require suppliers to track and report their engagement with disadvantaged community suppliers, where relevant and proportionate to the category.
Include contract clause that requires engagement of disadvantaged suppliers appropriate for market availability. Where operations involve supply chains touching indigenous territories, include contractual clause requiring counterparty compliance with Free, Prior and Informed Consent obligations.
Supplier Engagement
Goal Setting
Communicate the buyer's commitment to disadvantaged community sourcing to all suppliers and set goals together to identify and engage disadvantaged community businesses in suppliers' own sourcing.
Establish joint disadvantaged community sourcing improvement plans with strategic suppliers, including targets for increasing spend with indigenous and community-owned businesses in their own supply chains and timelines for achieving them.
Co-develop multi-year disadvantaged community sourcing roadmaps with strategic suppliers, including measurable targets for growing spend with community-owned businesses and expanding community business participation in their own supply chains.
Capacity Building
Provide suppliers with introductory guidance on disadvantaged community sourcing, covering how to identify disadvantaged community-owned businesses, relevant certification and recognition programs and how to begin engaging them in their own procurement.
Provide deeper training to suppliers on implementing disadvantaged community sourcing practices, including how to identify and certify protected community-owned businesses, how to set inclusion targets and how to remove barriers to participation.
Host training for tier 2 and 3 suppliers, equipping them to identify, qualify and prioritize indigenous and community-owned businesses in their own sourcing decisions.
Data
Request baseline information from existing suppliers on whether they qualify as a protected or disadvantaged community-owned businesses or whether they currently engage these businesses in their own supply chains.
Establish regular reporting from suppliers on their disadvantaged community sourcing practices in their own supply chains and expand data collection to tier 2 and 3 suppliers.
Require verification of supplier disadvantaged community sourcing practices and community-owned business spend claims across supply chain tiers.
Advisory
Provide guidance to suppliers on the buyer's definition of indigenous and disadvantaged community businesses and the steps required to identify and qualify them as part of their own supplier base.
Provide technical guidance to suppliers on developing their own disadvantaged community sourcing policies, including supplier qualification criteria, spend tracking mechanisms and community engagement approaches.
Support strategic suppliers in embedding disadvantaged community sourcing into their own procurement governance, including category strategies, supplier selection criteria and spend reporting on community-owned businesses.
Financial Support
Connect protected and disadvantaged community businesses with financing options and business development resources.
Offer preferential payment terms or early payment options for suppliers demonstrating active progress on disadvantaged community procurement commitments.
Link incentives such as contract extensions, volume increases, preferred supplier status, multi-year agreements or pricing adjustments to verified achievement of disadvantaged community business spend commitments across the supply chain.
Project Partnerships & Innovation
Create dedicated opportunities for indigenous and disadvantaged community businesses to propose sustainability project partnerships and innovative approaches to sustainable product development.
Ensure disadvantaged community business inclusion in innovation challenges or pilot programs and create dedicated opportunities for them to participate in joint product or service development initiatives.
Partner with industry peers, community business networks, international organizations and civil service organizations to build systemic disadvantaged community sourcing infrastructure across shared supply chains or engage in disadvantage community support projects.
Continuous Improvement
Metrics
Track the percentage of suppliers in the active base that are protected or disadvantaged community-owned businesses and monitor progress against the baseline participation target set in Strategy, including reducing disparities between participation and award rates for disadvantaged communities where suppliers demonstrate comparable capabilities.
Track progress against spend targets for disadvantaged community suppliers by category and monitor whether participation rates are improving over time.
Require all suppliers to provide metrics on disadvantaged community suppliers participation in supplier development programs and include in progress reporting.
Scorecards
Include completion of disadvantaged community sourcing baseline data requests as an indicator in supplier performance reviews.
Include the share of suppliers' own procurement spend with disadvantaged community suppliers as an indicator in supplier performance reviews.
Weigh disadvantaged community procurement performance in strategic supplier scorecards, with top performers receiving preferential weighting in tenders and bottom performers required to submit improvement plans.
Impact Verification
Gather feedback from suppliers on effectiveness of supplier engagement programs on disadvantaged community procurement.
Assess whether supplier engagement and capacity building initiatives are improving disadvantaged community procurement practices among strategic suppliers.
Measure the economic impact of disadvantaged community sourcing spend, including business growth, employment and income generation attributable to the buyer's procurement relationship.
Sources consulted
- https://www.trade.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/Indigenous%20Services%20Prese…
- https://synergygroup.net.au/insights/championing-diversity-and-inclusion-procur…
- https://www.sac-isc.gc.ca/eng/1760990558055/1760990583301
- https://tnfd.global/publication/guidance-on-engagement-with-indigenous-peoples-…
- https://hirefortalent.ca/toolkit/intersectionality/item/12-4-implementing-indig…
- https://belonging.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/gare-contract_for_equity_0.p…
- https://whitman.syracuse.edu/about/newsroom/whitman-news/news-detail/2024/04/04…
- https://www.zew.de/fileadmin/FTP/dp/dp17058.pdf
- https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/buying_better_outcomes_…
- https://www.ilo.org/publications/c169-indigenous-and-tribal-peoples-convention-…
- https://social.desa.un.org/issues/disability/convention-on-the-rights-of-person…
- https://social.desa.un.org/issues/indigenous-peoples/united-nations-declaration…